From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] gpio: pca953x: refactor pca953x_read_regs()
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:49:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473259770-26224-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473259770-26224-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Avoid the unnecessary if-else in pca953x_read_regs() by spltting the
routine into smaller, specialized functions and calling the right one
via a function pointer held in struct pca953x.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index 093bec1..52165ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct pca953x_chip {
const struct pca953x_offset *offset;
int (*write_regs)(struct pca953x_chip *, int, u8 *);
+ int (*read_regs)(struct pca953x_chip *, int, u8 *);
};
static int pca953x_read_single(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u32 *val,
@@ -220,24 +221,41 @@ static int pca953x_write_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
return 0;
}
-static int pca953x_read_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+static int pca953x_read_regs_8(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
{
int ret;
- if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio <= 8) {
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, reg);
- *val = ret;
- } else if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio >= 24) {
- int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
+ ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, reg);
+ *val = ret;
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
- (reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
- NBANK(chip), val);
- } else {
- ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(chip->client, reg << 1);
- val[0] = (u16)ret & 0xFF;
- val[1] = (u16)ret >> 8;
- }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs_16(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(chip->client, reg << 1);
+ val[0] = (u16)ret & 0xFF;
+ val[1] = (u16)ret >> 8;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs_24(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+ int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
+
+ return i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
+ (reg << bank_shift) | REG_ADDR_AI,
+ NBANK(chip), val);
+}
+
+static int pca953x_read_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = chip->read_regs(chip, reg, val);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "failed reading register\n");
return ret;
@@ -764,13 +782,16 @@ static int pca953x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio <= 8) {
chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_8;
+ chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_8;
} else if (chip->gpio_chip.ngpio >= 24) {
chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_24;
+ chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_24;
} else {
if (PCA_CHIP_TYPE(chip->driver_data) == PCA953X_TYPE)
chip->write_regs = pca953x_write_regs_16;
else
chip->write_regs = pca957x_write_regs_16;
+ chip->read_regs = pca953x_read_regs_16;
}
if (chip->chip_type == PCA953X_TYPE)
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-07 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-07 14:49 [PATCH v4 0/5] gpio: pca953x: code refactoring Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-09-07 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] gpio: pca953x: code shrink Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-09-07 15:09 ` Joe Perches
2016-09-07 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] gpio: pca953x: refactor pca953x_write_regs() Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-09-07 14:49 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2016-09-07 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] gpio: pca953x: remove an unused variable Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-09-07 14:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] gpio: pca953x: coding style fixes Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-09-07 15:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-09-07 15:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473259770-26224-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--to=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yong.b.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).