From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
slemieux@tycoint.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] LPC32xx gpio driver broken by commit 762c2e46 in 4.9-rc1
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:19:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476814751.24094.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e71451a-9392-92cf-c7f5-a5bcbf9d4dd1@mleia.com>
Hi Vladimir,
On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 21:06 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> On 18.10.2016 19:23, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > Vladimir, Linus, Alexandre,
> >
> > the current LPC32xx GPIO driver is broken by commit 762c2e46
> > (gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data).
>
> I do confirm, as well I've noticed that the driver is broken on v4.9,
> however I didn't find time to bisect the problematic commit, thank
> you to pinning it out.
>
> > A call to "of_get_named_gpio" to retrieve the GPIO will
> > always return -EINVAL, except for the first GPIO bank.
> >
> > Prior to this commit, the driver was working properly
> > because of the side-effect of the match function called by
> > "gpiochip_find" inside "of_get_named_gpiod_flags" function.
> >
> > I think, the proper long-term solution is to replace the
> > LPC32xx GPIO driver; an initial version was previously
> > submitted, by Vladimir Zapolskiy, to the mailing list:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg09746.html
>
> I still cherish a hope for submitting v2 for v4.10, the difference
> from v1 is expected to be relatively big (e.g. there will be 5
> banks instead of 6, on hardware level banks P0 and P1 are on the
> single controller, there will be other lesser differences also).
>
I will be available to test the new driver, once submitted
on the mailing list.
> > Is there any short-term solution that can be done with
> > the existing driver to keep the LPC32xx platform working
> > properly in the 4.9 mainline kernel?
>
> Unfortunately I didn't spend enough time to fix the problem,
> but in two words the root cause is that from the OF description
> there is only one on-SoC GPIO controller, but the GPIO controller
> driver registers multiple gpiochips (6 in this particular case),
> consumers specify a bank as a value in the first cell.
> The referenced commit simplifies the matter by assuming that
> a number of gpiochips for consumers is the same as the number
> of registered GPIO controllers from OF description.
>
> I don't think that the problem is specific only to the legacy
> LPC32xx GPIO controller driver, but at the moment I don't have
> any more examples to share. Probably another 3-cell GPIO
> controller driver gpio-etraxfs.c is also broken, a good enough
> implicit indicator for potentially broken drivers might be if
> you see gpiochip_add_data() call inside a loop:
> * gpio-sch311x.c
> * gpio-ml-ioh.c
> * gpio-etraxfs.c
> * gpio-htc-egpio.c
> * gpio-davinci.c
> * gpio-lpc32xx.c
>
As a temporary solution, locally I reverted the following
commits to be able to have a working platform on 4.9-rc1:
* "gpio: of: factor out common code to a new helper function"
(99468c1af913bb5662c223b68e783b4bf9200184)
* "gpio: of: remove of_gpiochip_and_xlate() and struct gg_data"
(762c2e46c0591d207289105c8718e4adf29b2b34)
Regards,
Sylvain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 16:23 [BUG] LPC32xx gpio driver broken by commit 762c2e46 in 4.9-rc1 Sylvain Lemieux
2016-10-18 18:06 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-10-18 18:19 ` Sylvain Lemieux [this message]
2016-10-24 0:46 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 7:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476814751.24094.6.camel@localhost \
--to=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slemieux@tycoint.com \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).