linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
To: linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gnurou@gmail.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, j-keerthy@ti.com,
	t-kristo@ti.com
Subject: [PATCH V3 1/5] gpio: davinci: Remove gpio2regs function to accommodate multi instances
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:49:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484669955-5349-2-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484669955-5349-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>

gpio2regs is written making an assumption that driver supports only
one instance of gpio controller. Removing this and adding a generic
array so as to support multiple instances of gpio controllers.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---

Changes in v2:

  * Added a comment to explain divide by 2 logic for register sets.

 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 35 +++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 163f81e..bb47de3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -43,25 +43,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_regs {
 #define MAX_LABEL_SIZE 20
 
 static void __iomem *gpio_base;
-
-static struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *gpio2regs(unsigned gpio)
-{
-	void __iomem *ptr;
-
-	if (gpio < 32 * 1)
-		ptr = gpio_base + 0x10;
-	else if (gpio < 32 * 2)
-		ptr = gpio_base + 0x38;
-	else if (gpio < 32 * 3)
-		ptr = gpio_base + 0x60;
-	else if (gpio < 32 * 4)
-		ptr = gpio_base + 0x88;
-	else if (gpio < 32 * 5)
-		ptr = gpio_base + 0xb0;
-	else
-		ptr = NULL;
-	return ptr;
-}
+static unsigned int offset_array[5] = {0x10, 0x38, 0x60, 0x88, 0xb0};
 
 static inline struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *irq2regs(struct irq_data *d)
 {
@@ -262,7 +244,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #endif
 		spin_lock_init(&chips[i].lock);
 
-		regs = gpio2regs(base);
+		regs = gpio_base + offset_array[i];
 		if (!regs)
 			return -ENXIO;
 		chips[i].regs = regs;
@@ -417,7 +399,9 @@ static int gpio_irq_type_unbanked(struct irq_data *data, unsigned trigger)
 davinci_gpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
 		     irq_hw_number_t hw)
 {
-	struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g = gpio2regs(hw);
+	struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips =
+				(struct davinci_gpio_controller *)d->host_data;
+	struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g = chips[hw / 32].regs;
 
 	irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &gpio_irqchip, handle_simple_irq,
 				"davinci_gpio");
@@ -554,7 +538,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		irq_chip->irq_set_type = gpio_irq_type_unbanked;
 
 		/* default trigger: both edges */
-		g = gpio2regs(0);
+		g = chips[0].regs;
 		writel_relaxed(~0, &g->set_falling);
 		writel_relaxed(~0, &g->set_rising);
 
@@ -573,8 +557,11 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	 * then chain through our own handler.
 	 */
 	for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; bank++, bank_irq++, gpio += 16) {
-		/* disabled by default, enabled only as needed */
-		g = gpio2regs(gpio);
+		/* disabled by default, enabled only as needed
+		 * There are register sets for 32 GPIOs. 2 banks of 16
+		 * GPIOs are covered by each set of registers hence divide by 2
+		 */
+		g = chips[bank / 2].regs;
 		writel_relaxed(~0, &g->clr_falling);
 		writel_relaxed(~0, &g->clr_rising);
 
-- 
1.9.1

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17 16:19 [PATCH V3 0/5] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip Keerthy
2017-01-17 16:19 ` Keerthy [this message]
2017-01-18 23:17   ` [PATCH V3 1/5] gpio: davinci: Remove gpio2regs function to accommodate multi instances Linus Walleij
2017-01-17 16:19 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] gpio: davinci: Remove unwanted blank line Keerthy
2017-01-18 23:18   ` Linus Walleij
2017-01-17 16:19 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip Keerthy
2017-01-17 16:19 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] gpio: davinci: Add support for multiple GPIO controllers Keerthy
2017-01-18 23:23   ` Linus Walleij
2017-01-17 16:32 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] gpio: davinci: Redesign driver to accommodate ngpios in one gpio chip Keerthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1484669955-5349-2-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --to=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).