From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: acpi: acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get: ignore the status of unselected irqs
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:19:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489432753.20145.226.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3133c2fe-427e-f742-9647-d1f45eeaed4a@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 18:56 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 13-03-17 18:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 21:58 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > I will incorporate slightly different version of this (due to
> > changes
> > happened) into my branch. Please verify if everything is okay.
>
> I just noticed that my patch was botched up a bit, it is
> taking a more complex approach then needed and it contained a bug
> (it did lookup->index = index, which should be lookup->index = i).
>
> I've just finished writing a v2 (sorry).
NP.
Does it mean this one replaces both from v2? (to me looks like)
> I've attached the v2 here,
> note this is against an unmodified v4.11-rc2 rather then your branch
> as I needed a clean base to debug some problems. But it should be
> easy to adapt to your branch I think.
>
> Note this can go upstream either way (through your branch or
> directly since it is based on a clean v4.11-rc2 now) but it is
> probably easier to take it upstream through your branch to
> avoid conflicts.
I will rebase my series on your patch, but I'm going to slightly modify
it anyway (basically squash one of my patches).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-10 20:58 [PATCH 0/2] gpio: acpi: acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get: ignore the status of unselected irqs Hans de Goede
2017-03-10 20:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: acpi: acpi_gpio_resource_lookup: return info even if there is no desc Hans de Goede
2017-03-15 10:17 ` Linus Walleij
2017-03-15 10:19 ` Hans de Goede
2017-03-10 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: acpi: acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get: ignore the status of unselected irqs Hans de Goede
2017-03-13 17:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-13 17:56 ` Hans de Goede
2017-03-13 19:19 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-03-13 19:23 ` Hans de Goede
2017-03-13 19:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-13 19:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-13 22:02 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489432753.20145.226.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).