From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: acpi: acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get: ignore the status of unselected irqs Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:31:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1489433465.20145.228.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20170310205846.16530-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1489425824.20145.223.camel@linux.intel.com> <3133c2fe-427e-f742-9647-d1f45eeaed4a@redhat.com> <1489432753.20145.226.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:15893 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095AbdCMTcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Hans de Goede , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 13-03-17 20:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 18:56 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > On 13-03-17 18:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 21:58 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I will rebase my series on your patch, but I'm going to slightly > > modify > > it anyway (basically squash one of my patches). > > Ok, sounds good. If you're going to use my patch as a base, > shall I cherry-pick the version with your changes squashed and > submit that upstream stand-alone ? If you want to, I have no objections. Lemme submit the branch first. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy