From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:03:00 +0300 Message-ID: <1490713380.708.32.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20170323202138.GA11912@dtor-ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij , Dmitry Torokhov , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to > > parsing > > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is > correct? While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans' opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy