From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] gpiolib: acpi: Introduce NO_RESTRICTION quirk Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:41:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1511962871.25007.485.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20171110134033.85461-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20171110134033.85461-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20171113115554.GY18997@lahna.fi.intel.com> <1510578648.25007.166.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Mika Westerberg , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 13:35 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 13:55 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > I think you should include user of this quirk in the patch series > > > as > > > well. Otherwise it is pretty pointless to add random quirks > > > without > > > real issues they are supposed to solve ;-) > > > > Something like below? > > I bet this patch is already somewhere in my mailbox else just send > it separately. All these patches are applied. I'm going to send them (there are two affected users) next week. It would be nice if you can prepare immutable branch in case the subsystems would like to merge patches via their respective trees. Thanks for applying! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy