Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI, ASoC, gpio: Add and use acpi_dev_get_first_match_name()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 14:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, January 5, 2018 5:09:32 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It appears that at least one current user (patch 3) and upcoming one
> > (patch 2) need to get device name by ACPI HID.
> > 
> > Here we introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() based on code
> > done for acpi_dev_present() and reuse it where appropriate.
> > 
> > The series has been tested on Intel Edison with non-ACPI and
> > ACPI enabled versions of U-Boot, while patches 1 and 3 were tested
> > by Pierre.
> > 
> > Since patch 1 and cross subsystem nature of the series I think
> > the best way is to push this (patches 1 and 2) via Rafael's linux-pm 
> > tree.
> > 
> > Taking into consideration that patch 3 requires not-yet-applied work
> > from Pierre, I left it for reference, in particular to show the LOC
> > statistics.
> > 
> > Changelog v3:
> > - add Pierre's tag (I dared to do this for both patches 1 and 3)
> > - address comment about function name (patch 1)
> > - add a reference to the first user (patch 1)
> > - consolidate pin control device possible names in one place (patch
> > 2)
> > - rebase ASoC patch on not-yet-applied series from Pierre (patch 3),
> > and
> > - thus reordered to make it last in the series (patch 3)
> > 
> > Andy Shevchenko (3):
> >   ACPI / utils: Introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name()
> >   gpio: merrifield: Add support of ACPI enabled platforms
> >   ASoC: Intel - Convert to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_name()
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/utils.c                    | 41
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-merrifield.c          | 11 ++++++++-
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h                 |  3 +++
> >  include/linux/acpi.h                    |  6 +++++
> >  include/sound/soc-acpi.h                |  7 ------
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_da7213.c  |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_es8316.c  |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c   |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c   |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5645.c |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5672.c |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/soc-acpi.c                    | 33 ----------------------
> > ----
> >  12 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> 
> [1-2/3] applied and I set up a git branch with them to pull from for
> Mark.

Thanks, Rafael!

So, the roadmap is as I see the following:
1) Mark applies (if no objection) latest version of the second patch
series from Pierre...
2) ...followed by PR from Rafael...
3) ...followed by the patch 3 from this series.

Mark, does it sound like a plan to you?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy