* [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines @ 2018-09-12 4:51 Aditya Prayoga 2018-09-12 4:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip Aditya Prayoga 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Aditya Prayoga @ 2018-09-12 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-gpio Cc: Thierry Reding, Linus Walleij, linux-pwm, linux-kernel, Andrew Lunn, Richard Genoud, Ralph Sennhauser, Gregory CLEMENT, Gauthier Provost, Dennis Gilmore, Aditya Prayoga Hi everyone, Helios4, an Armada 388 based NAS SBC, provides 2 (4-pins) fan connectors. The PWM pins on both connector are connected to GPIO on bank 1. Current gpio-mvebu does not allow more than one PWM on the same bank. Aditya --- Changes v1->v2: * Merge/squash "[Patch 2/2] gpio: mvebu: Allow to use non-default PWM counter" * Allow only two PWMs as suggested by Andrew Lunn and Richard Genoud --- Aditya Prayoga (1): gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip 2018-09-12 4:51 [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines Aditya Prayoga @ 2018-09-12 4:51 ` Aditya Prayoga 2018-09-12 13:01 ` Andrew Lunn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Aditya Prayoga @ 2018-09-12 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-gpio Cc: Thierry Reding, Linus Walleij, linux-pwm, linux-kernel, Andrew Lunn, Richard Genoud, Ralph Sennhauser, Gregory CLEMENT, Gauthier Provost, Dennis Gilmore, Aditya Prayoga Allow more than 1 PWM request (eg. PWM fan) on the same GPIO chip. If the other PWM counter is unused, allocate it to next PWM request. The priority would be: 1. Default counter assigned to the bank 2. Unused counter that is assigned to other bank Since there are only two PWM counters, only two PWMs supported. Signed-off-by: Aditya Prayoga <aditya@kobol.io> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c index 6e02148..2d46b87 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c @@ -92,9 +92,16 @@ #define MVEBU_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK 32 +enum mvebu_pwm_counter { + MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_SET_A = 0, + MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_SET_B, + MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_MAX +}; + struct mvebu_pwm { void __iomem *membase; unsigned long clk_rate; + enum mvebu_pwm_counter id; struct gpio_desc *gpiod; struct pwm_chip chip; spinlock_t lock; @@ -128,6 +135,8 @@ struct mvebu_gpio_chip { u32 level_mask_regs[4]; }; +static struct mvebu_pwm *mvebu_pwm_list[MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_MAX]; + /* * Functions returning addresses of individual registers for a given * GPIO controller. @@ -594,34 +603,59 @@ static struct mvebu_pwm *to_mvebu_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) return container_of(chip, struct mvebu_pwm, chip); } +static struct mvebu_pwm *mvebu_pwm_get_avail_counter(void) +{ + enum mvebu_pwm_counter i; + + for (i = MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_SET_A; i < MVEBU_PWM_CTRL_MAX; i++) { + if (!mvebu_pwm_list[i]->gpiod) + return mvebu_pwm_list[i]; + } + return NULL; +} + static int mvebu_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) { struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); struct mvebu_gpio_chip *mvchip = mvpwm->mvchip; struct gpio_desc *desc; + struct mvebu_pwm *counter; unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); - if (mvpwm->gpiod) { - ret = -EBUSY; - } else { - desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, - pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); - if (IS_ERR(desc)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(desc); + counter = mvpwm; + if (counter->gpiod) { + counter = mvebu_pwm_get_avail_counter(); + if (!counter) { + ret = -EBUSY; goto out; } - ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); - if (ret) { - gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); - goto out; - } + pwm->chip_data = counter; + } - mvpwm->gpiod = desc; + desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, + pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(desc); + goto out; } + + ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); + if (ret) { + gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); + goto out; + } + + regmap_update_bits(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + + mvchip->offset, BIT(pwm->hwpwm), + counter->id ? BIT(pwm->hwpwm) : 0); + regmap_read(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + + mvchip->offset, &counter->blink_select); + + counter->gpiod = desc; out: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); return ret; @@ -632,6 +666,11 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); unsigned long flags; + if (pwm->chip_data) { + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; + pwm->chip_data = NULL; + } + spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); gpiochip_free_own_desc(mvpwm->gpiod); mvpwm->gpiod = NULL; @@ -648,6 +687,9 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, unsigned long flags; u32 u; + if (pwm->chip_data) + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; + spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); val = (unsigned long long) @@ -695,6 +737,9 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned long flags; unsigned int on, off; + if (pwm->chip_data) + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; + val = (unsigned long long) mvpwm->clk_rate * state->duty_cycle; do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC); if (val > UINT_MAX) @@ -804,6 +849,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, return -ENOMEM; mvchip->mvpwm = mvpwm; mvpwm->mvchip = mvchip; + mvpwm->id = id; mvpwm->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); if (IS_ERR(mvpwm->membase)) @@ -825,6 +871,7 @@ static int mvebu_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, * region. */ mvpwm->chip.base = -1; + mvebu_pwm_list[id] = mvpwm; spin_lock_init(&mvpwm->lock); -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip 2018-09-12 4:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip Aditya Prayoga @ 2018-09-12 13:01 ` Andrew Lunn 2018-09-13 11:14 ` Aditya Prayoga 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Lunn @ 2018-09-12 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Aditya Prayoga Cc: linux-gpio, Thierry Reding, Linus Walleij, linux-pwm, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud, Ralph Sennhauser, Gregory CLEMENT, Gauthier Provost, Dennis Gilmore > static int mvebu_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > { > struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); > struct mvebu_gpio_chip *mvchip = mvpwm->mvchip; > struct gpio_desc *desc; > + struct mvebu_pwm *counter; > unsigned long flags; > int ret = 0; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > > - if (mvpwm->gpiod) { > - ret = -EBUSY; > - } else { > - desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, > - pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); > - if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(desc); > + counter = mvpwm; > + if (counter->gpiod) { > + counter = mvebu_pwm_get_avail_counter(); > + if (!counter) { > + ret = -EBUSY; I don't understand this bit of code. Please could you explain what is going on. > goto out; > } > > - ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > - if (ret) { > - gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > - goto out; > - } > + pwm->chip_data = counter; > + } > > - mvpwm->gpiod = desc; > + desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, > + pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); > + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(desc); > + goto out; > } > + > + ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > + if (ret) { > + gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > + goto out; > + } > + > + regmap_update_bits(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + > + mvchip->offset, BIT(pwm->hwpwm), > + counter->id ? BIT(pwm->hwpwm) : 0); > + regmap_read(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + > + mvchip->offset, &counter->blink_select); > + > + counter->gpiod = desc; > out: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > return ret; > @@ -632,6 +666,11 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); > unsigned long flags; > > + if (pwm->chip_data) { > + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; > + pwm->chip_data = NULL; > + } > + > spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > gpiochip_free_own_desc(mvpwm->gpiod); > mvpwm->gpiod = NULL; > @@ -648,6 +687,9 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > unsigned long flags; > u32 u; > > + if (pwm->chip_data) > + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; > + You should not need a cast here, if chip_data is a void *. What is pwm->chip_data is a NULL? Don't you then use an uninitialized mvpwm? Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip 2018-09-12 13:01 ` Andrew Lunn @ 2018-09-13 11:14 ` Aditya Prayoga 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Aditya Prayoga @ 2018-09-13 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Lunn Cc: linux-gpio, Thierry Reding, Linus Walleij, linux-pwm, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud, ralph.sennhauser, gregory.clement, Gauthier Provost, Dennis Gilmore On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:01 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > static int mvebu_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > > { > > struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); > > struct mvebu_gpio_chip *mvchip = mvpwm->mvchip; > > struct gpio_desc *desc; > > + struct mvebu_pwm *counter; > > unsigned long flags; > > int ret = 0; > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > > > > - if (mvpwm->gpiod) { > > - ret = -EBUSY; > > - } else { > > - desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, > > - pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); > > - if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(desc); > > + counter = mvpwm; > > + if (counter->gpiod) { > > + counter = mvebu_pwm_get_avail_counter(); > > + if (!counter) { > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > I don't understand this bit of code. Please could you explain what is > going on. Check whether bank's default counter is already used. If it's used then try to find and check other counter. If it also being used that mean both, counter A and counter B, already assigned to some PWM device so return EBUSY. > > > goto out; > > } > > > > - ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > > - if (ret) { > > - gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > > - goto out; > > - } > > + pwm->chip_data = counter; > > + } > > > > - mvpwm->gpiod = desc; > > + desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(&mvchip->chip, > > + pwm->hwpwm, "mvebu-pwm"); > > + if (IS_ERR(desc)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(desc); > > + goto out; > > } > > + > > + ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, 0); > > + if (ret) { > > + gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + regmap_update_bits(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + > > + mvchip->offset, BIT(pwm->hwpwm), > > + counter->id ? BIT(pwm->hwpwm) : 0); > > + regmap_read(mvchip->regs, GPIO_BLINK_CNT_SELECT_OFF + > > + mvchip->offset, &counter->blink_select); > > + > > + counter->gpiod = desc; > > out: > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > > return ret; > > @@ -632,6 +666,11 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > > struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); > > unsigned long flags; > > > > + if (pwm->chip_data) { > > + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; > > + pwm->chip_data = NULL; > > + } > > + > > spin_lock_irqsave(&mvpwm->lock, flags); > > gpiochip_free_own_desc(mvpwm->gpiod); > > mvpwm->gpiod = NULL; > > @@ -648,6 +687,9 @@ static void mvebu_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > unsigned long flags; > > u32 u; > > > > + if (pwm->chip_data) > > + mvpwm = (struct mvebu_pwm *) pwm->chip_data; > > + > > You should not need a cast here, if chip_data is a void *. > > What is pwm->chip_data is a NULL? Don't you then use an uninitialized > mvpwm? mvpwm is declared and initialized as: struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = to_mvebu_pwm(chip); so it's not an uninitialized variable. pwm->chip_data is set when the pwm use counter other then default. pwm->chip_data take precedence over to_mvebu_pwm(chip). After looked at other PWM driver, i think i should use pwm_set_chip_data() and pwm_get_chip_data() instead of directly access pwm->chip_data. Now i think it would be better if i use struct mvebu_pwm *mvpwm = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm); and pwm_set_chip_data() would be called during mvebu_pwm_probe() to set the data to bank's default counter. Aditya > Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-13 11:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-09-12 4:51 [PATCH v2 0/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines Aditya Prayoga 2018-09-12 4:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip Aditya Prayoga 2018-09-12 13:01 ` Andrew Lunn 2018-09-13 11:14 ` Aditya Prayoga
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).