From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/27] sh-pfc: Support pins with no associated GPIO port Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1635782.W0dvDAedis@avalon> References: <1373933479-17727-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <20130921004335.GA26271@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:47038 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752391Ab3IUS4E (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:56:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Simon Horman , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Kuninori Morimoto Hi Linus and Simon, On Saturday 21 September 2013 10:59:20 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Laurent, > > > > I am currently rebasing the renesas tree on v3.12-rc1 in preparation > > for preparing pull-requests for v3.13. Should I continue to carry > > sh-pfc/pins-with-no-gpio-port in devel? > > Sounds like something I should carry in the pinctrl tree? The series has been merged in v3.12-rc1, no action is thus needed. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart