From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:56:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1695077.V4sgFrjTJR@avalon> References: <1378278183-26596-1-git-send-email-george.cherian@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: George Cherian , Laurent Pinchart , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-OMAP , Kuninori Morimoto , Nikolay Balandin List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tuesday 17 September 2013 14:51:48 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, George Cherian wrote: > > This patch series > > > > - removes the irq_demux_work > > - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq > > - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done. > > > > v1 --> v2 > > > > Split v1 to 3 patches > > > > v2 --> v3 > > > > Remove the unnecessary dts patches. > > > > v3 --> v4 > > > > Remove gpio->irq (in patch 2) > > Applied all three patches with Kuninoro's ACK. > > However your last iteration was still labeled "v3" in the subject > so I was a bit confused, but I took all those sent on sep 4. > > Please check the result in my GPIO tree or linux-next and > make sure it works. > > > Note: these patches were made after applying [1]. > > [1] - [PATCH v5] gpio: pcf857x: Add OF support - > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/27/70 > > Well that patch is not finished, but by rebasing patch 2 with > patch -p1 < patch2.patch it applied anyway. > > Now Laurent has to finalize his DT bindings on top of your patches instead. I will do so. At first sight I don't see any conflict issue. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart