From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Pinctrl fixes for rockchip Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:56:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1796168.f97MNRYGcl@diego> References: <1416437493-25588-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:46671 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbaKZRxK (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:53:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1416437493-25588-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Doug Anderson , Sonny Rao , Dmitry Torokhov , Chris Zhong , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus, Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2014, 14:51:31 schrieb Doug Anderson: > These two patches fix some pinctrl issues on rockchip. The first > fixes a real issue where interrupts were being left on in > suspend/resume and waking the system up when they shouldn't. The > second fixes purely theoretical problems but seems clean. > > I've tested these patches more extensively on a non-mainline tree but > have done basic compile and boot testing on mainline. I don't have > suspend/resume working so well on mainline yet, so I haven't tested > fully there. As indicated by my review-tag in the patches, these look good to me. Do you want to take them normally [they should simply go on top of the other patches] or do you prefer another pull request - which feels strange for only two patches :-) . Thanks Heiko