From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] net: rfkill: gpio: convert to descriptor-based GPIO interface Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20131121172217.GE2281@intel.com> References: <1385045153-25160-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1385045153-25160-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20131121152425.GA5557@xps8300> <528E3D5E.20907@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528E3D5E.20907@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rhyland Klein Cc: Heikki Krogerus , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , Chris Ball , Johannes Berg , Adrian Hunter , Alex Courbot , Mathias Nyman , Rob Landley , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:05:34PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote: > This seems like a reasonable patch, and likely a good way to go. I don't > have a AC100 to test this with though, so I can't verify this > personally. Also, would the paz00 patch become a dependency of this > patchset? Mika, maybe you can therefore include a patch for paz00 in > your patchset? Sure I can, if everyone is OK with that.