From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add GPIO support for SMSC SCH311x Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:05:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20131210170527.GB26978@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1386116613-5241-1-git-send-email-br1@einfach.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:36307 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755120Ab3LJRFb (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:05:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Bruno Randolf , platform-driver-x86 , Seth Heasley , Darren Hart , Vivien Didelot , Wim Van Sebroeck , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Mika Westerberg , Mathias Nyman , David Cohen , Simon Guinot On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:51:30PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Matthew is this how discovery and registration of x86 platform > drivers for port-mapped devices should work or are we doing > something weird here? This is pretty awful, but typical. LPC devices *should* be present in ACPI to some extent, but often you'll just find (at best) a reference to a superIO chip and no child devices. Do we have an example DSDT for a device with this part? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org