linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gpio: tc3589x: get rid of static IRQ base
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:47:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140417074742.GD28725@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397044139-19306-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>

> The static IRQ base is not used on any platforms with this chip
> (only Ux500). Get rid of it forever, and rely on dynamic IRQ
> descriptor allocation.
> 
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c | 10 +---------
>  include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c
> index 113e50cb1f59..4b0d8ccbe561 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tc3589x.c
> @@ -32,9 +32,6 @@ struct tc3589x_gpio {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	struct mutex irq_lock;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
> -
> -	int irq_base;
> -
>  	/* Caches of interrupt control registers for bus_lock */
>  	u8 regs[CACHE_NR_REGS][CACHE_NR_BANKS];
>  	u8 oldregs[CACHE_NR_REGS][CACHE_NR_BANKS];
> @@ -290,8 +287,6 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops tc3589x_irq_ops = {
>  static int tc3589x_gpio_irq_init(struct tc3589x_gpio *tc3589x_gpio,
>  				struct device_node *np)
>  {
> -	int base = tc3589x_gpio->irq_base;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * If this results in a linear domain, irq_create_mapping() will
>  	 * take care of allocating IRQ descriptors at runtime. When a base
> @@ -299,7 +294,7 @@ static int tc3589x_gpio_irq_init(struct tc3589x_gpio *tc3589x_gpio,
>  	 * domain is instantiated.
>  	 */
>  	tc3589x_gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(np,
> -			tc3589x_gpio->chip.ngpio, base, &tc3589x_irq_ops,
> +			tc3589x_gpio->chip.ngpio, 0, &tc3589x_irq_ops,
>  			tc3589x_gpio);
>  	if (!tc3589x_gpio->domain) {
>  		dev_err(tc3589x_gpio->dev, "Failed to create irqdomain\n");
> @@ -348,9 +343,6 @@ static int tc3589x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	tc3589x_gpio->chip.of_node = np;
>  #endif
>  
> -	tc3589x_gpio->irq_base = tc3589x->irq_base ?
> -		tc3589x->irq_base + TC3589x_INT_GPIO(0) : 0;
> -
>  	/* Bring the GPIO module out of reset */
>  	ret = tc3589x_set_bits(tc3589x, TC3589x_RSTCTRL,
>  			       TC3589x_RSTCTRL_GPIRST, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h b/include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h
> index 6b8e1ff4672b..e6088c2e2092 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ enum tx3589x_block {
>  #define TC3589x_INT_PORIRQ	7
>  
>  #define TC3589x_NR_INTERNAL_IRQS	8
> -#define TC3589x_INT_GPIO(x)	(TC3589x_NR_INTERNAL_IRQS + (x))
>  
>  struct tc3589x {
>  	struct mutex lock;

Does this actually compile? Does this patch have a dependency?

I see TC3589x_INT_GPIO(x) being used still:

  include/linux/mfd/tc3589x.h:
    #define TC3589x_NR_IRQS                TC3589x_INT_GPIO(TC3589x_NR_GPIOS)
-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-17  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-09 11:48 [PATCH 3/4] gpio: tc3589x: get rid of static IRQ base Linus Walleij
2014-04-17  7:47 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-04-23 12:16   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140417074742.GD28725@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).