From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mvebu: Remove initcall-based driver initialization Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:08:48 -0300 Message-ID: <20140509130848.GB764@arch.cereza> References: <1398372890-7568-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:45600 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751136AbaEINJV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 09:09:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Thomas Petazzoni , Gregory Clement , Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk On 09 May 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Ezequiel Garcia > wrote: >=20 > > There's no reason to use an initcall to initialize this driver, > > and regular module_platform_driver() can be used instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia >=20 > Has anyone tested this on real hardware? That is the only test that > counts on initcalls as it happens. >=20 Yup, tested on my mvebu boards, don't remember which one. --=20 Ezequiel Garc=EDa, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html