From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:08:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604130837.GA28484@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140602231423.GF11004@atomide.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2344 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:14:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [140602 16:06]:
> > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [140425 00:53]:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> > > <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > > > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> > > > descriptor-based API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > It appears this can save quite a lot of code in drivers, work that
> > > I trust Thierry to persue based on this to some extent so patch is
> > > tentatively applied unless something comes up.
> >
> > Looks like this patch causes a regression where GPIOs on I2C will
> > no longer return -EPROBE_DEFER but seem to return -ENOENT instead.
> >
> > This breaks drivers using things like devm_gpiod_get_index()
> > on a GPIO that's on a I2C bus not probed yet.
> >
> > Reverting commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for
> > property names) fixes things.
>
> Looks like something like below fixes the issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
> 8< -----------------------
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:13:46 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Fix handling for deferred probe for -gpio suffix
>
> Commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names)
> added parsing for both -gpio and -gpios suffix but also changed
> the handling for deferred probe unintentionally. Because of the
> looping the second name will now return -ENOENT instead of
> -EPROBE_DEFER. Fix the issue by breaking out of the loop if
> -EPROBE_DEFER is encountered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
>
> desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx,
> &of_flags);
> - if (!IS_ERR(desc))
> + if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER))
> break;
> }
This looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 15:28 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Thierry Reding
2014-04-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names Thierry Reding
2014-04-24 12:47 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 14:06 ` Rob Herring
2014-04-24 18:22 ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-25 15:24 ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-02 22:22 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-25 7:38 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-04-25 7:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-02 23:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-02 23:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-04 13:08 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-06-12 8:18 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140604130837.GA28484@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).