linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:08:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140604130837.GA28484@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140602231423.GF11004@atomide.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2344 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:14:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [140602 16:06]:
> > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [140425 00:53]:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> > > <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > > > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> > > > descriptor-based API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > > It appears this can save quite a lot of code in drivers, work that
> > > I trust Thierry to persue based on this to some extent so patch is
> > > tentatively applied unless something comes up.
> > 
> > Looks like this patch causes a regression where GPIOs on I2C will
> > no longer return -EPROBE_DEFER but seem to return -ENOENT instead.
> > 
> > This breaks drivers using things like devm_gpiod_get_index()
> > on a GPIO that's on a I2C bus not probed yet.
> > 
> > Reverting commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for
> > property names) fixes things.
> 
> Looks like something like below fixes the issue.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 
> 8< -----------------------
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:13:46 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Fix handling for deferred probe for -gpio suffix
> 
> Commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names)
> added parsing for both -gpio and -gpios suffix but also changed
> the handling for deferred probe unintentionally. Because of the
> looping the second name will now return -ENOENT instead of
> -EPROBE_DEFER. Fix the issue by breaking out of the loop if
> -EPROBE_DEFER is encountered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> 
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
>  
>  		desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx,
>  						&of_flags);
> -		if (!IS_ERR(desc))
> +		if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER))
>  			break;
>  	}

This looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-04 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 15:28 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Thierry Reding
2014-04-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names Thierry Reding
2014-04-24 12:47   ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 14:06     ` Rob Herring
2014-04-24 18:22       ` Thierry Reding
2014-04-25 15:24         ` Stephen Warren
2014-05-02 22:22           ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-25  7:38       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-04-25  7:52   ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-02 23:04     ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-02 23:14       ` Tony Lindgren
2014-06-04 13:08         ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-06-12  8:18         ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-24 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: of: Remove unneeded dummy function Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140604130837.GA28484@ulmo \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).