From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use of gpiochip_remove() retval Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20141007091417.GM25331@lee--X1> References: <1412086542-1662-1-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> <1412086542-1662-2-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:40810 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753194AbaJGJOX (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 05:14:23 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ar1so4800897iec.24 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Pramod Gurav , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Samuel Ortiz , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav > wrote: >=20 > > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns > > void. > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz > > CC: Lee Jones > > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav >=20 > Already fixed in the GPIO tree. What does that mean? That it doesn't need fixing here? If this patch still needs applying it will carry more weight with your Ack. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html