linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029164122.GC29965@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141029104559.GC21251@lukather>

Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote on Wed [2014-Oct-29 11:45:59 +0100]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:09:58PM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > Based on Boris Brezillion work this is a reworked patch
> > of his initial GPIO hogging mechanism.
> > This patch provides a way to initally configure specific GPIO
> > when the gpio controller is probe.
> > 
> > The actual DT scanning to collect the GPIO specific data is performed
> > as part of the gpiochip_add().
> > 
> > The purpose of this is to allows specific GPIOs to be configured
> > without any driver specific code.
> > This particularly usueful because board design are getting
> > increassingly complex and given SoC pins can now have upward
> > of 10 mux values a lot of connections are now dependent on
> > external IO muxes to switch various modes and combination.
> > 
> > Specific drivers should not necessarily need to be aware of
> > what accounts to a specific board implementation. This board level
> > "description" should be best kept as part of the dts file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> 
> I've been thinking about this for quite some time, it's good to see
> some progress on that :)
> 
> However, I have a slightly different use case for it: the Allwinner
> SoCs have a vdd pin coming in for every gpio bank. Nothing out of the
> ordinary so far, except that some of the boards are using a
> GPIO-controlled regulator to feed another bank vdd. That obviously
> causes a chicken-egg issue, since for the gpio-regulator driver to
> probe, it needs to gpio driver, and for the gpio driver to probe, it
> needs the regulator driver.

Unless the gpio controlling the vdd pin is from the same bank your trying to power up
I do not see the issue here.

In this patch the gpio-hogs are setup as part of the gpio-controller probe function.

> 
> I was thinking of solving this by enforcing gpio hogs, in order to
> have the gpio driver loading, grabing its gpios setting them to the
> right value to enable the current to flow in, and then let the
> regulator driver probe later on.
> 
> I don't think it's possible with your current code, would it be
> something worth considering, or would someone have a better solution?

Unless I am missing something, this should work.

> 
> Maxime
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com

Regards,
Benoit



  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-29 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 20:09 [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29  7:09 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-29 16:21   ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30  0:29     ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-14  9:19   ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-14 10:22     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29  8:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 16:34   ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29 16:42     ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 19:36       ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30  0:31       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-03  9:43   ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-29 10:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 16:41   ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2014-10-29 16:47     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 23:09       ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 17:16         ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-03  9:59 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-04  0:38   ` Benoit Parrot
     [not found]     ` <20141104003827.GA24005-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-14  9:16       ` Linus Walleij
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-06 11:58 [GIT PULL] bulk pin control changes for v3.18 Linus Walleij
2014-10-06 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-10-21 10:55   ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-19 14:34 Boris BREZILLON
     [not found] ` <1387463671-1164-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon-ZNYIgs0QAGpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-19 14:34   ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-12-19 16:41     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 16:47       ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-19 17:18         ` boris brezillon
2013-12-19 18:22           ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-30  9:48             ` boris brezillon
2014-01-08  9:45               ` Linus Walleij
     [not found]       ` <20131219164109.GB27409-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-19 17:13         ` boris brezillon
2014-09-20 21:37       ` Ben Gamari
2014-09-20 22:26         ` Ben Gamari
2014-01-08  9:37     ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-08 10:18       ` boris brezillon
2014-01-14 10:27         ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-02 15:47           ` Benoit Parrot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141029164122.GC29965@ti.com \
    --to=bparrot@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).