From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:41:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029164122.GC29965@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141029104559.GC21251@lukather>
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote on Wed [2014-Oct-29 11:45:59 +0100]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:09:58PM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > Based on Boris Brezillion work this is a reworked patch
> > of his initial GPIO hogging mechanism.
> > This patch provides a way to initally configure specific GPIO
> > when the gpio controller is probe.
> >
> > The actual DT scanning to collect the GPIO specific data is performed
> > as part of the gpiochip_add().
> >
> > The purpose of this is to allows specific GPIOs to be configured
> > without any driver specific code.
> > This particularly usueful because board design are getting
> > increassingly complex and given SoC pins can now have upward
> > of 10 mux values a lot of connections are now dependent on
> > external IO muxes to switch various modes and combination.
> >
> > Specific drivers should not necessarily need to be aware of
> > what accounts to a specific board implementation. This board level
> > "description" should be best kept as part of the dts file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
>
> I've been thinking about this for quite some time, it's good to see
> some progress on that :)
>
> However, I have a slightly different use case for it: the Allwinner
> SoCs have a vdd pin coming in for every gpio bank. Nothing out of the
> ordinary so far, except that some of the boards are using a
> GPIO-controlled regulator to feed another bank vdd. That obviously
> causes a chicken-egg issue, since for the gpio-regulator driver to
> probe, it needs to gpio driver, and for the gpio driver to probe, it
> needs the regulator driver.
Unless the gpio controlling the vdd pin is from the same bank your trying to power up
I do not see the issue here.
In this patch the gpio-hogs are setup as part of the gpio-controller probe function.
>
> I was thinking of solving this by enforcing gpio hogs, in order to
> have the gpio driver loading, grabing its gpios setting them to the
> right value to enable the current to flow in, and then let the
> regulator driver probe later on.
>
> I don't think it's possible with your current code, would it be
> something worth considering, or would someone have a better solution?
Unless I am missing something, this should work.
>
> Maxime
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 20:09 [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29 7:09 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-29 16:21 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 0:29 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-14 9:19 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-14 10:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 8:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 16:34 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-29 16:42 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2014-10-29 19:36 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 0:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-11-03 9:43 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-29 10:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 16:41 ` Benoit Parrot [this message]
2014-10-29 16:47 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-29 23:09 ` Benoit Parrot
2014-10-30 17:16 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-03 9:59 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-04 0:38 ` Benoit Parrot
[not found] ` <20141104003827.GA24005-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-14 9:16 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-06 11:58 [GIT PULL] bulk pin control changes for v3.18 Linus Walleij
2014-10-06 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Benoit Parrot
2014-10-21 10:55 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-19 14:34 Boris BREZILLON
[not found] ` <1387463671-1164-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon-ZNYIgs0QAGpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-19 14:34 ` Boris BREZILLON
2013-12-19 16:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 16:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-19 17:18 ` boris brezillon
2013-12-19 18:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-30 9:48 ` boris brezillon
2014-01-08 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <20131219164109.GB27409-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-19 17:13 ` boris brezillon
2014-09-20 21:37 ` Ben Gamari
2014-09-20 22:26 ` Ben Gamari
2014-01-08 9:37 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-08 10:18 ` boris brezillon
2014-01-14 10:27 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-02 15:47 ` Benoit Parrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029164122.GC29965@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).