From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-tb10x: remove incorrect __exit markup
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:55:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150318165527.GB11485@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaUMDZYmK6t5S7LZcmZw6e-viTd0Z4d2UtXZCvEX9RSWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:30:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, the devices can be unbound from the
> > driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> > remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> > platform_driver_probe() which specifically disables sysfs bind/unbind
> > attributes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>
> I prefer to have this fixed by setting
> .suppress_bind_attrs = true
> in the struct device_driver .drv portion of the device driver,
> so the driver cannot be removed from sysfs.
>
> So platform_driver_probe() isn't really the only exception,
> there is a way to do the same supression on ordinary drivers
> if we know we won't fiddle with them from sysfs.
Yes, you are right, setting suppress_bind_attrs will work too.
>
> Can you make a patch as per above (alternatively tell me
> how wrong I am...)
Unfortunately I won't be able to do that as I can't provide
justification for such change (i.e. I do not know why you want to
disable unbinding while still keeping the remove() implementation.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 18:04 [PATCH] gpio: gpio-tb10x: remove incorrect __exit markup Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-17 12:30 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-18 16:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2015-03-25 15:32 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-25 17:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-27 10:24 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-27 10:25 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150318165527.GB11485@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).