From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Fix GPIO numbering for deferred probe
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 16:52:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150904235235.GB4215@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E96BC6.1040003@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [150904 03:04]:
> On 09/03/2015 08:31 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >If gpio-omap probe fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, the GPIO numbering
> >keeps increasing. Only increase the gpio count if gpiochip_add()
> >was successful as otherwise the numbers will increase for each
> >probe attempt.
> >
> >Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> >Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
> >Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> >Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> >@@ -1095,7 +1095,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank, struct irq_chip *irqc)
> > } else {
> > bank->chip.label = "gpio";
> > bank->chip.base = gpio;
> >- gpio += bank->width;
> > }
> > bank->chip.ngpio = bank->width;
> >
> >@@ -1105,6 +1104,9 @@ static int omap_gpio_chip_init(struct gpio_bank *bank, struct irq_chip *irqc)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >+ if (!bank->is_mpuio)
> >+ gpio += bank->width;
> >+
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
> > /*
> > * REVISIT: Once we have OMAP1 supporting SPARSE_IRQ, we can drop
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>
> With hope that only GPIO0 will be deferred, otherwise
> there will be total mess in gpios enumeration ;)
Heh nope :) If pinctrl currently ever causes deferred probe
things will get totally messed up.. Works fine after $subject
patch.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 17:31 [PATCH] gpio: omap: Fix GPIO numbering for deferred probe Tony Lindgren
2015-09-04 10:00 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-09-04 23:52 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-09-08 14:14 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150904235235.GB4215@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).