linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: keep the GPIO line names internal
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 15:37:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151004133742.GO4284@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443050853-24601-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 04:27:33PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This refactors the changes to the GPIO line naming mechanism to
> not have so widespread effects, instead we conclude the patch series
> by having created a name attribute in the GPIO descriptor, that need
> not be globally unique, and it will be initialized from the old
> .names array in struct gpio_chip if it exists, then used in the legacy
> sysfs code like the array was used previously.
> 
> The associated changes to name lines from the device tree are
> controversial and need to stand alone from this. Resulting changes:
> 
> 1. Remove the export and the header for the gpio_name_to_desc() as so
> far the only use is inside gpiolib.c. Staticize gpio_name_to_desc()
> and move it above the only function using it.
> 
> 2. Only print a warning if there are two GPIO lines with the same name.
> The reason is to preserve current behaviour: before the previous
> changes to the naming mechanism this would not reject probing the
> driver, instead the error would occur when trying to export the line
> in sysfs, so restore this behaviour, but print a friendly warning
> if names collide.

This looks good (apart from the checkpatch warning for the warning
message string).

You also need to revert ddd5404007b8 ("gpio-sysfs: Use gpio descriptor
name instead of gpiochip names array") however as this is an ABI change.  
Otherwise pins with a name in DT will now be exported using the gpio name
rather than number as they used to be. [ The current behaviour is
maintained by exporting names from chip->names for hard coded names
only. ]

Thanks,
Johan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-04 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-23 23:27 [PATCH] gpio: keep the GPIO line names internal Linus Walleij
2015-09-24  7:40 ` Markus Pargmann
2015-09-24 16:47   ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-04 13:37 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2015-10-05  8:54   ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-05 10:01     ` Johan Hovold
2015-10-05 11:07       ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-06  9:13         ` Markus Pargmann
2015-10-06 14:09           ` Johan Hovold
2015-10-16 14:41           ` Linus Walleij
2015-10-05  9:47   ` Markus Pargmann
2015-10-05 10:07     ` Johan Hovold
2015-10-05 10:19       ` Markus Pargmann
2015-10-05 11:10         ` Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151004133742.GO4284@localhost \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).