From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:47:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20151016154723.GA23531@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <201510071151.hH4lMK2P%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20151007024018.GA25534@sophia> <20151007031413.GA12931@roam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , William Breathitt Gray , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kbuild-all@01.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. > > > > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically > > > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > > > CC: William Breathitt Gray > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > > This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches > with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied. > It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the > patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the > mailing list. Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@mediatek.com> So it should show up in the same thread as this email? [RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge Thanks, Fengguang