From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpio: Intel Baytrail support Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:49:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20160125114903.GE1790@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1453566729-30220-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453566729-30220-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Antoine Tenart Cc: ptyser@xes-inc.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:32:06PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote: > This series introduces the GPIO Intel Baytrail support, using both the > lpc ich and the gpio ich drivers. > > Antoine Tenart (3): > gpio: gpio-ich: add support for Intel Baytrail Intel Baytrail support has been in mainline kernel for quite some time already. The driver is drivers/pintctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c. Also the ICH GPIO block is not compatible to Baytrail which is why there is a separate driver in the first place. Have you tested this series on Baytrail? > mfd: lpc_ich: use a correct mask for the GPIO base address > mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail All Baytrails I've seen expose the GPIO device via ACPI namespace so there should be no need for the above two patches.