From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: lpc_ich: add GPIO support for Baytrail Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20160128154822.GC1778@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1453566729-30220-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1453566729-30220-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:49566 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965872AbcA1Pvn (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:51:43 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Antoine Tenart , "ptyser@xes-inc.com" , Lee Jones , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:34:40AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Antoine Tenart > wrote: > > > This patch adds the GPIO support for the Baytrail family. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > I'm confused by this and Mika's comment on patch 0. > > Is the BayTrail an ICH variant or not? Or does it have > two GPIO controllers? Or um .... It is not compatible with ICH and there is only one GPIO controller in the SoC.