From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] ARM: sunxi: Introduce MACH_SUN8I_A83T option Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:12:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20160301071253.GI8418@lukather> References: <1456672738-4993-1-git-send-email-vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com> <1456672738-4993-14-git-send-email-vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456672738-4993-14-git-send-email-vishnupatekar0510-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Vishnu Patekar Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org, emilio-0Z03zUJReD5OxF6Tv1QG9Q@public.gmane.org, jenskuske-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, patchesrdh-I1/eAgTnXDYAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org --nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:18:58PM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote: > A83T has CPUS clock similar to A80's. currently, a80 cpus clock only > compiled for A80. So, Introduce MACH_SUN8I_A83T to compile it for > A83T as well. > > Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > index c124d65..424b76d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > @@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ config MACH_SUN8I > select ARM_GIC > select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > > +config MACH_SUN8I_A83T > + bool "Allwinner A83T (sun8i) SoCs support" > + default ARCH_SUNXI > + select ARM_GIC > + > config MACH_SUN9I > bool "Allwinner (sun9i) SoCs support" > default ARCH_SUNXI > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile > index 3fd7901..2aabfc4 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ obj-y += clk-usb.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_A83T) += clk-sun8i-apb0.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I_A83T) += clk-sun9i-cpus.o > + This is not how it should be done. You should rather create a Kconfig option for these clocks, and use def_bool CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I || CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I Switching to Kconfig for the clocks has been on my todo-list for quite some time, I guess these two clocks would be a good start. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --nEsDIrWrg+hrB7l1--