linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@intenta.de>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: zynq: initialize clock even without CONFIG_PM
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 13:03:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601110259.GA30501@laureti-dev> (raw)

When the PM initialization was moved in the commit referenced below, the
code enabling the clock was removed from the probe function. On
CONFIG_PM=y kernels, this is not a problem as the pm resume hook enables
the clock, but when power management is disabled, all those pm_*
functions are noops and the clock is never enabled resulting in a
dysfunctional gpio controller.

Put the clock initialization back to support CONFIG_PM=n.

Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@intenta.de>
Fixes: 3773c195d387 ("gpio: zynq: Do PM initialization earlier to support gpio hogs")
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I verified that after this patch both CONFIG_PM=y and CONFIG_PM=n
configurations work.

Should this patch be copied to stable@vger.kernel.org? It seems that
CONFIG_PM=n is not a commonly used configuration anymore.

Please Cc me in any replies.

Helmut

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index e29cf58..3cbe63c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -714,11 +714,17 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "input clock not found.\n");
 		return PTR_ERR(gpio->clk);
 	}
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpio->clk);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to enable clock.\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
 
+	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
 	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
 	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+		goto err_disable_unprepare_clk;
 
 	/* report a bug if gpio chip registration fails */
 	ret = gpiochip_add(chip);
@@ -750,6 +756,8 @@ err_rm_gpiochip:
 	gpiochip_remove(chip);
 err_pm_put:
 	pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
+err_disable_unprepare_clk:
+	clk_disable_unprepare(gpio->clk);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.1.4


             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 11:03 Helmut Grohne [this message]
2016-06-02 12:30 ` [PATCH] gpio: zynq: initialize clock even without CONFIG_PM Linus Walleij
2016-06-02 16:43   ` Helmut Buchsbaum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160601110259.GA30501@laureti-dev \
    --to=h.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).