From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from rx51-peripherals Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:14:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20160723141421.GC12632@windriver.com> References: <20160720041332.30789-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160720041332.30789-2-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160722064101.GW28140@atomide.com> <20160722140242.GC11410@windriver.com> <20160723055524.GA28140@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:33045 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882AbcGWOO7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:14:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160723055524.GA28140@atomide.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org [Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from rx51-peripherals] On 22/07/2016 (Fri 22:55) Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Gortmaker [160722 07:02]: [...] > > Having the patch present, or having the file deleted both take care of > > my concern -- which was was introducing build regressions when adding > > the gpio header cleanup into for-4.9 content. > > OK. As I've already pushed out the board-*.c removal branch, I > suggest we just drop the $subject patch to avoid a merge conflict. Sounds like a plan. I'll just keep it in my local queue so my tests don't fail and drop it on the floor once I see your removal loop around to me via linux-next or master. Thanks, Paul. -- > > Regards, > > Tony