From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/33] SA11x0/PXA GPIO rework (Core + PCMCIA only) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:34:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160901153416.GY1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20160829100232.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20160829102328.GA28796@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:56271 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754360AbcIAPei (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:34:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Courbot , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Kristoffer Ericson , Robert Jarzmik On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:31:58PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > For all the GPIO patches: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > With the smallish changes needed to patch 5/33 that one is acked too. > > In fact I would ACK it anyway, because the net total cleanup is so > nice on the kernel at large... SA11x0 has never been prettier than > after this series. Thanks, ack applied to all the gpio patches. > I suspect you want to keep the series together and queue it in the ARM > tree? Else tell me what to apply in the GPIO tree. Yes, I need to keep the series together because of the dependencies - trying to split it up will lead to conflicts and breakage from missing include files, and when it's not from missing include files, it'll be non-functional. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.