linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, aalonso@freescale.com, b38343@freescale.com,
	ldewangan@nvidia.com, van.freenix@gmail.com,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: freescale: avoid overwriting pin config when freeing GPIO
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:42:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160930021208.GC14138@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478f2c1989ab735b0f86d2fe579f94f@agner.ch>

On 29-09-16, 09:33, Stefan Agner wrote:
> You need to differentiate between Vybrid and i.MX:
> 
> Vybrid muxes a pin to GPIO on gpio_request_one (via .gpio_request_enable
> callback)
> i.MX does not mux a pin as GPIO on its own, but needs to be muxed
> explicitly. That has been always the case...
> 
> I don't know what behavior is right, it is just "different"...

Hmm, I think What Vybrid and Tegra have done is better, but it would be better
to get inputs from Linus, which you already asked for :)

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-30  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-27  0:26 [PATCH] pinctrl: freescale: avoid overwriting pin config when freeing GPIO Stefan Agner
2016-09-27 12:12 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-09-27 16:37   ` Stefan Agner
2016-09-27 18:17     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-09-27 19:34       ` Stefan Agner
2016-09-27 20:28         ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-09-28  2:00         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-09-28  3:38           ` Stefan Agner
2016-09-28  4:14             ` Viresh Kumar
2016-09-29 16:33               ` Stefan Agner
2016-09-30  2:12                 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-10-10  8:32                 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-28 12:07             ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-09-29  6:46               ` Viresh Kumar
2016-09-29 12:16                 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-09-30  2:22                   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-10  8:33 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160930021208.GC14138@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=aalonso@freescale.com \
    --cc=b38343@freescale.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).