Re: [PATCH 00/12] Move pad retention control to Exynos pin controller driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:23:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 07:44:55AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patchset is a follow-up of my work on adding runtime PM support
> > to Exynos pin controller driver:
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg550161.html
> > 
> > Runtime PM support itself needs a bit more discussion, so lets first focus on
> > the prerequisites.
> > 
> > In case of Exynos pin controller driver it is a pad retention control. In
> > current code it was handled by machine and PMU code and had no relation to
> > what pin controller driver does. This patch series moves pad retention
> > control to pin controller driver. While implmenting it, I also did a little
> > cleanup of both Exynos PMU and pin controller drivers.
> > 
> > Patches are based on linux-next from 2017.01.16 with Exynos4415 support
> > removal patch applied: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/14/137
> 
> I didn't find explicit statement for dependency between the patches in
> the patchset itself and also I could not find the usage of
> EXYNOS_PMU_DEV_NAME by pinctrl driver.

Okay, now I found the usage of the function from header so this answers
the question below about dependency in the patchset itself. Anyway it
would be nice to state that explicitly.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Do the pinctrl changes depend on soc/samsung patches? If not, then
> probably your future work will depend on this?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof