Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: pc104: Mask PC/104 drivers via the PC104 Kconfig option

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:45:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, William Breathitt Gray
> <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:13:02PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>On 10/01/17 18:51, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> >>> PC/104 drivers should be hidden on machines which do not support PC/104
> >>> devices. This patch adds the PC104 Kconfig option as a dependency for
> >>> the relevant PC/104 device driver Kconfig options.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> >>> Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
> >>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
> >>> Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
> >>> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> >>Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> >>
> >>Now the question is how to merge this one.  Let me know if you
> >>want me to take this one via IIO after the first patch is in.
> >>If you want to take it another route I'm fine with that.
> >>
> >>Jonathan
> >
> > This is such a simple patchset that I envision Greg K-H picking up all
> > three patches via driver-core; however, I'm pretty indifferent about the
> > ultimate path in the end. I'll leave it up to Greg K-H to decide.
> 
> As long as Greg merges the first patch we can merge the two
> others orthogonally I think.
> 
> It's just Kconfig symbols, not things that break compile.
> 
> (But I bet someone will come with automated warnings about
> unused symbols in the kernel...)

We already have that tool, scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.pl :)

I'll go merge this first patch now.

thanks,

greg k-h