From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: pc104: Mask PC/104 drivers via the PC104 Kconfig option Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:42:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20170119114201.GA31804@kroah.com> References: <512f7f9909c9ff6964b34e0302eeb404e703f033.1484073325.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <4236ccf5-1480-ea3c-fee6-35ea252e3756@kernel.org> <20170110214535.GA21354@sophia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39716 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752332AbdASLlt (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2017 06:41:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: William Breathitt Gray , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:45:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, William Breathitt Gray > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:13:02PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>On 10/01/17 18:51, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > >>> PC/104 drivers should be hidden on machines which do not support PC/104 > >>> devices. This patch adds the PC104 Kconfig option as a dependency for > >>> the relevant PC/104 device driver Kconfig options. > >>> > >>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron > >>> Cc: Hartmut Knaack > >>> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen > >>> Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler > >>> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray > >>Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron > >> > >>Now the question is how to merge this one. Let me know if you > >>want me to take this one via IIO after the first patch is in. > >>If you want to take it another route I'm fine with that. > >> > >>Jonathan > > > > This is such a simple patchset that I envision Greg K-H picking up all > > three patches via driver-core; however, I'm pretty indifferent about the > > ultimate path in the end. I'll leave it up to Greg K-H to decide. > > As long as Greg merges the first patch we can merge the two > others orthogonally I think. > > It's just Kconfig symbols, not things that break compile. > > (But I bet someone will come with automated warnings about > unused symbols in the kernel...) We already have that tool, scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.pl :) I'll go merge this first patch now. thanks, greg k-h