From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Cristina Ciocan <cristina.ciocan@intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Suspicious debounce handling code in pintctrl-baytrail
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:43:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126134341.GI17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126142020.7bfd1229@endymion>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:20:20PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Cristina,
>
> In this commit:
>
> commit 658b476c742fe379e7020309fd590a27b457a4c1
> Date: Fri Apr 1 14:00:07 2016 +0300
>
> pinctrl: baytrail: Add debounce configuration
>
> you added support for getting and setting debounce configuration for
> the Baytrail pins. Now gcc complains about the following:
>
> CC [M] drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.o
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c: In function ‘byt_pin_config_set’:
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c:1181:17: warning: variable ‘debounce’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> u32 conf, val, debounce;
> ^
>
> I looked at the code, and it indeed looks wrong. You are reading the
> BYT_DEBOUNCE_REG register, clearing the debounce time bits from it, and
> then writing the debounce time bits to the *BYT_CONF0_REG* register.
> This is certainly corrupting the chip configuration, as the
> configuration register bits 2-0 have a completely different meaning
> (mux configuration.)
Yes, you are right.
This is fixed by following commit from Andy:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=04ff5a095d662e0879f0eb04b9247e092210aeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-26 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-26 13:20 Suspicious debounce handling code in pintctrl-baytrail Jean Delvare
2017-01-26 13:43 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2017-01-26 14:00 ` Jean Delvare
2017-01-26 14:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-26 14:24 ` Jean Delvare
2017-01-26 14:13 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2017-01-26 14:15 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2017-01-26 14:50 ` mika.westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170126134341.GI17297@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=cristina.ciocan@intel.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).