From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:55:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20170127095553.02cbd9ad@endymion> References: <20170125162608.58bfbfb1@endymion> <20170125161651.GX17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20170126100506.5edf26e3@endymion> <20170126092911.GF17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170126092911.GF17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Mika Westerberg , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Heikki Krogerus , Linus Walleij , Mathias Nyman , Paul Gortmaker List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:29:11 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I have not, as I do not have access to any Baytrail hardware. This is > > the very reason why I'd like this code to be buildable as a module: I'm > > not happy with a useless 50 kB driver being loaded on all my systems. I > > was hopping someone at Intel would have access to the hardware to > > perform the test. > > We do not have all the possible hardware here. I have one Minnowboard > MAX which I can test this on (like I commented in the other email) but > it does not have any ACPI GPIO OpRegion stuff that is present in many > Baytrail based laptops out there. Takashi, do you have any such laptop or know anyone at SUSE who does and could test? -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support