Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] dmaengine: sun6i: allow build on ARM64 platforms (sun50i)

Icenowy Zheng
2017-01-30T18:23:55Z

31.01.2017, 00:41, "Vinod Koul" <vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>  As 64-bit Allwinner H5 SoC has the same DMA engine with H3, the DMA
>>  driver should be allowed to be built for ARM64, in order to make it work on H5.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy-ymACFijhrKM@public.gmane.org>
>>  Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
>>  Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>
>>  ---
>>  Patch introduced between v1 and v2, to satisfy the newly added H3/H5 audio
>>  codec support.
>>
>>   drivers/dma/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>  diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>  index 0d6a96ee9fc7..d01d59812cf3 100644
>>  --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>  +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>  @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ config DMA_SUN4I
>>
>>   config DMA_SUN6I
>>           tristate "Allwinner A31 SoCs DMA support"
>>  - depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || COMPILE_TEST
>>  + depends on MACH_SUN6I || MACH_SUN8I || (ARM64 && ARCH_SUNXI) || COMPILE_TEST
>
> Do we really need ARM64 here? also looking at others I wonder why isn't
> this MACH_SUNXI...?

You mean directly place "ARCH_SUNXI" here?

SUN4I/SUN5I/SUN7I do not use DMA_SUN6I, they have different DMA
controllers.

>
> --
> ~Vinod

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.