From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Rename devm_get_gpiod_from_child() Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:06:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20170131010607.GC35974@dtor-ws> References: <1485790909-2915-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1485790909-2915-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:33569 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753696AbdAaBGL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:06:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1485790909-2915-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Tomi Valkeinen , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:41:48PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Rename devm_get_gpiod_from_child() into > devm_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child() to reflect the fact that this > function is operating on a fwnode object. I believe this is completely pointless rename. Are you planning on adding devm_of_get_gpiod_from_child()? Or devm_acpt_get_gpiod_from_child()? (I sure hope not). Also, on what object? Does it take fwnode as first argument? Or maybe we should call it devm_dev_const_charp_fwnode_get_gpiod_from_child() so we know types of all arguments? Please, no. Thanks. -- Dmitry