From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: PM / wakeirq: Convert to SRCU
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 06:53:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170624135320.GS3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706241153260.1941@nanos>
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:56:11AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The wakeirq infrastructure uses RCU to protect the list of wakeirqs. That
> breaks the irq bus locking infrastructure, which allows sleeping functions
> to be called so interrupt controllers behind slow busses, e.g. i2c, can be
> handled.
>
> The wakeirq functions hold rcu_read_lock and call into irq functions, which
> in case of interrupts using the irq bus locking will trigger a
> might_sleep() splat.
>
> Convert the wakeirq infrastructure to Sleepable RCU and unbreak it.
>
> Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling")
> Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Looks plausible. One suggestion on initialization below, and a couple
of questions about uses of RCU that this patch does not convert to SRCU.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(wakeup_sources);
>
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(wakeup_count_wait_queue);
>
> +static struct srcu_struct wakeup_srcu;
I suggest this to avoid the need for boot-time init_srcu_struct():
DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(wakeup_srcu);
> +
> static struct wakeup_source deleted_ws = {
> .name = "deleted",
> .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(deleted_ws.lock),
> @@ -198,7 +200,7 @@ void wakeup_source_remove(struct wakeup_
> spin_lock_irqsave(&events_lock, flags);
> list_del_rcu(&ws->entry);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events_lock, flags);
> - synchronize_rcu();
> + synchronize_srcu(&wakeup_srcu);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wakeup_source_remove);
The uses of RCU in device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs() and
device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs() are unrelated and thus do not
need to be converted? Or am I looking at the wrong version of
the kernel? (Looking at f65013d655ac ("Merge branch 'for-linus' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace")
in Linus's tree.)
If these two functions are making unrelated use of RCU and thus don't
need to be converted to SRCU, might be worth a comment somewhere.
> @@ -804,10 +806,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_wakeup_dev_event);
> void pm_print_active_wakeup_sources(void)
> {
> struct wakeup_source *ws;
> - int active = 0;
> + int srcuidx, active = 0;
> struct wakeup_source *last_activity_ws = NULL;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + srcuidx = srcu_read_lock(&wakeup_srcu);
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) {
> if (ws->active) {
> pr_debug("active wakeup source: %s\n", ws->name);
> @@ -823,7 +825,7 @@ void pm_print_active_wakeup_sources(void
> if (!active && last_activity_ws)
> pr_debug("last active wakeup source: %s\n",
> last_activity_ws->name);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + srcu_read_unlock(&wakeup_srcu, srcuidx);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_print_active_wakeup_sources);
>
> @@ -950,8 +952,9 @@ void pm_wakep_autosleep_enabled(bool set
> {
> struct wakeup_source *ws;
> ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> + int srcuidx;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + srcuidx = srcu_read_lock(&wakeup_srcu);
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) {
> spin_lock_irq(&ws->lock);
> if (ws->autosleep_enabled != set) {
> @@ -965,7 +968,7 @@ void pm_wakep_autosleep_enabled(bool set
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&ws->lock);
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + srcu_read_unlock(&wakeup_srcu, srcuidx);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM_AUTOSLEEP */
Same question for pm_wakep_autosleep_enabled().
> @@ -1026,15 +1029,16 @@ static int print_wakeup_source_stats(str
> static int wakeup_sources_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> struct wakeup_source *ws;
> + int srcuidx;
>
> seq_puts(m, "name\t\tactive_count\tevent_count\twakeup_count\t"
> "expire_count\tactive_since\ttotal_time\tmax_time\t"
> "last_change\tprevent_suspend_time\n");
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + srcuidx = srcu_read_lock(&wakeup_srcu);
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry)
> print_wakeup_source_stats(m, ws);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + srcu_read_unlock(&wakeup_srcu, srcuidx);
>
> print_wakeup_source_stats(m, &deleted_ws);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-24 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-24 9:56 PM / wakeirq: Convert to SRCU Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-24 12:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-24 12:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-24 12:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-24 13:53 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-06-25 9:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-25 14:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-25 17:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-25 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-26 10:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-06-26 20:37 ` Brian Norris
2017-06-28 20:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170624135320.GS3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=julia@ni.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).