* [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled
@ 2017-07-28 16:21 Fabio Estevam
2017-07-31 11:17 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-02 12:27 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2017-07-28 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linus.walleij
Cc: sergei.shtylyov, andrew, dmitry.torokhov, linux-gpio, festevam,
Fabio Estevam
gpiod_get_optional() returns NULL when GPIOLIB is disabled since
commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when
GPIOLIB is disabled").
However, many gpiod functions still have WARN_ON(1) in their
GPIOLIB=n stubs, which causes warnings in drivers even if the
GPIO descriptor is requested via gpiod_get_optional().
Prior to commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from
gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled") it was indeed true
the comment: "GPIO can never have been requested" as gpiod_get_optional()
used to return an error.
After this commit the returned value is NULL, so the comment and
WARN_ON(1) are no longer accurate.
An example of this kernel warning can be see in this report:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2563045.html
Remove the WARN_ON(1) so that drivers can silently work fine
without kernel warnings when GPIOLIB is disabled.
Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
---
Changes since RFC:
- Expand a bit on the commit log
- Include the kernel warning example
include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 59 -------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h b/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
index 8f702fc..40c1be5 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/consumer.h
@@ -197,17 +197,11 @@ gpiod_get_array_optional(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
static inline void gpiod_put(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
might_sleep();
-
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline void gpiod_put_array(struct gpio_descs *descs)
{
might_sleep();
-
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline struct gpio_desc *__must_check
@@ -254,150 +248,99 @@ devm_gpiod_get_array_optional(struct device *dev, const char *con_id,
{
return NULL;
}
-
static inline void devm_gpiod_put(struct device *dev, struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
might_sleep();
-
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
-
static inline void devm_gpiod_put_array(struct device *dev,
struct gpio_descs *descs)
{
might_sleep();
-
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
-
-
static inline int gpiod_get_direction(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline int gpiod_direction_input(struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline int gpiod_direction_output(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline int gpiod_direction_output_raw(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOSYS;
}
-
static inline int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline void gpiod_set_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline void gpiod_set_array_value(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_desc **desc_array,
int *value_array)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline int gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline void gpiod_set_raw_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline void gpiod_set_raw_array_value(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_desc **desc_array,
int *value_array)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline int gpiod_get_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline void gpiod_set_value_cansleep(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline void gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_desc **desc_array,
int *value_array)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline int gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline void gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep(struct gpio_desc *desc,
int value)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline void gpiod_set_raw_array_value_cansleep(unsigned int array_size,
struct gpio_desc **desc_array,
int *value_array)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
}
static inline int gpiod_set_debounce(struct gpio_desc *desc, unsigned debounce)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline int gpiod_is_active_low(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline int gpiod_cansleep(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
static inline int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -408,8 +351,6 @@ static inline struct gpio_desc *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio)
static inline int desc_to_gpio(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
{
- /* GPIO can never have been requested */
- WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled
2017-07-28 16:21 [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled Fabio Estevam
@ 2017-07-31 11:17 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-02 12:27 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2017-07-31 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: linus.walleij, sergei.shtylyov, andrew, dmitry.torokhov,
linux-gpio, festevam
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2141 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:21:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> gpiod_get_optional() returns NULL when GPIOLIB is disabled since
> commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when
> GPIOLIB is disabled").
>
> However, many gpiod functions still have WARN_ON(1) in their
> GPIOLIB=n stubs, which causes warnings in drivers even if the
> GPIO descriptor is requested via gpiod_get_optional().
>
> Prior to commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from
> gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled") it was indeed true
> the comment: "GPIO can never have been requested" as gpiod_get_optional()
> used to return an error.
>
> After this commit the returned value is NULL, so the comment and
> WARN_ON(1) are no longer accurate.
>
> An example of this kernel warning can be see in this report:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2563045.html
>
> Remove the WARN_ON(1) so that drivers can silently work fine
> without kernel warnings when GPIOLIB is disabled.
>
> Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> - Expand a bit on the commit log
> - Include the kernel warning example
>
> include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 59 -------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 59 deletions(-)
How about cases where the GPIO was not optional? Do we still want those
to be silently ignored? I guess in some way that makes sense as well,
but after this patch we're deviating from existing behaviour for non-
optional GPIOs.
Also, if we do decide that we want to silently ignore all GPIO calls if
GPIOLIB is disabled, maybe it would still be a good idea to warn users
about this at least once, so that they don't go chasing wild geese?
In either case, I think the commit message is still confusing because
you're arguing that gpiod_get_optional() now returns NULL and therefore
it is fine to remove WARN_ON(), whereas the WARN_ON() would still be
valid for non-NULL GPIO descriptors (such as requested via gpiod_get()
when GPIOLIB=n.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled
2017-07-28 16:21 [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled Fabio Estevam
2017-07-31 11:17 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2017-08-02 12:27 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2017-08-02 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov, Andrew Lunn, Dmitry Torokhov,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> wrote:
> gpiod_get_optional() returns NULL when GPIOLIB is disabled since
> commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from gpiod_get_optional when
> GPIOLIB is disabled").
>
> However, many gpiod functions still have WARN_ON(1) in their
> GPIOLIB=n stubs, which causes warnings in drivers even if the
> GPIO descriptor is requested via gpiod_get_optional().
>
> Prior to commit 22c403676dbbb7c6 ("gpio: return NULL from
> gpiod_get_optional when GPIOLIB is disabled") it was indeed true
> the comment: "GPIO can never have been requested" as gpiod_get_optional()
> used to return an error.
>
> After this commit the returned value is NULL, so the comment and
> WARN_ON(1) are no longer accurate.
>
> An example of this kernel warning can be see in this report:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2563045.html
>
> Remove the WARN_ON(1) so that drivers can silently work fine
> without kernel warnings when GPIOLIB is disabled.
>
> Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
I explained in another commend why I see this as a non-issue.
Drivers that call GPIO accessors likely need them to work properly.
If they see these messages I suspect it is because of missing
depends on or select of GPIOLIB in their Kconfig.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-02 12:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-28 16:21 [PATCH] gpio: consumer: Remove WARN_ON(1) when GPIOLIB is disabled Fabio Estevam
2017-07-31 11:17 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-02 12:27 ` Linus Walleij
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).