From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <timur@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
"Miquèl Raynal" <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>,
"Nadav Haklai" <nadavh@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction"
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:18:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831091812.6f7d417e@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbxdkHukALfYMrM7w=1KNJKLBhGebbkEpMb3C3+nCfWOA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:08:45 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > However, even the "reference" pinctrl-single.c implementation does it,
> > in pcs_request_gpio().
>
> Yeah so we have unclear semantics on this and that is just a fact of
> life. It's a bit of pain as maintainer because I sometimes don't know
> what to do when something makes superficial sense and the only thing
> I can do is to toss it into linux-next and see what happens.
>
> Look what happened :D
>
> If the semantics should be changed, all drivers must be changed consistently
> in a larger patch series, so until then, we revert this and leave it as it is.
>
> Now this is reverted anyways.
Thanks for taking action on this. Regarding the semantics, the
kerneldoc comment says:
* @gpio_request_enable: requests and enables GPIO on a certain pin.
* Implement this only if you can mux every pin individually as GPIO. The
* affected GPIO range is passed along with an offset(pin number) into that
* specific GPIO range - function selectors and pin groups are orthogonal
* to this, the core will however make sure the pins do not collide.
* @gpio_disable_free: free up GPIO muxing on a certain pin, the reverse of
* @gpio_request_enable
So the ->gpio_request_enable() comment is not super clear, but the
->gpio_disable_free() explicitly says "free up GPIO muxing", which
would mean the ->gpio_request_enable() hook has muxed the pin as GPIO.
Things could be clearer, but I believe it's quite clear the intent is
that the ->gpio_request_enable() should mux the pin as a GPIO at the HW
level.
Note that on my side, I've however not been convinced by this semantic:
I find it weird that when you request a GPIO, it gets automatically
muxed as such, without an explicit pinctrl configuration in the DT.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 9:24 linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction" Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 12:31 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 13:59 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2017-08-30 14:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 14:22 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 14:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 16:24 ` jmondi
2017-08-30 19:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 7:08 ` Linus Walleij
2017-08-31 7:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-08-31 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 9:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-08-31 9:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 18:39 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 9:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 13:05 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 10:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-31 7:04 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831091812.6f7d417e@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).