From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: single: Remove invalid message Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:51:15 -0800 Message-ID: <20171214165115.27150-1-tony@atomide.com> Return-path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:60368 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753099AbdLNQvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:51:20 -0500 Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Haojian Zhuang , Grygorii Strashko , Nishanth Menon , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Pinctrl single should just show how many pins were found, the physical address is already in the dev information. So let's remove the wrong information that claims to show the physical address but really prints a virtual address that is now hashed. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -1774,8 +1774,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dev_warn(pcs->dev, "initialized with no interrupts\n"); } - dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins at pa %p size %u\n", - pcs->desc.npins, pcs->base, pcs->size); + dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins, size %u\n", pcs->desc.npins, pcs->size); return pinctrl_enable(pcs->pctl); -- 2.15.0