From: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: document gpio-mt7621 bindings
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:45:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614044539.GA8681@foobar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+0bnEmE2n-O3a7ecSXOsjTfZD3AqJDQunO6xzUF_W-=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:28:35PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for your time in reviewing this.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 09:30:10AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>> Add a devicetree binding documentation for the mt7621 driver.
> >>
>
> >>> + second cell specifies GPIO flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
> >>> + Only the GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flags are supported.
> >>> +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
> >>> +- reg : The id of the bank that the node describes.
> >>
> >> I'd prefer to not have banks defined in DT. Do you have a variable
> >> number or resources that are per bank? If not, then you don't need them.
> >
> > Mmmm, That's what I understood from documentation:
> >
> > "Some system-on-chips (SoCs) use the concept of GPIO banks. ...
> > Usually each such bank is
> > exposed in the device tree as an individual gpio-controller node. ..."
>
> This should be conditioned on being able to divide up the registers by
> bank which seems like you can't. Or there's the case like the DW GPIO
> block and the number of banks is configurable.
I see. Thanks for clarifing this.
>
> > If this is not a good approach, could you please me point me out to a
> > device tree example where
> > the correct approach is being used?
>
> I'm not sure offhand. There are lots of examples of single nodes I'm
> sure. Which ones have banks I haven't a clue. IIRC, there were some
> cases where the bank # was part of the GPIO cells, but I seem to
> recall Linus prefers not having 3 cells.
Ok, so... does the following single node sounds acceptable?
gpio: gpio@600 {
#gpio-cells = <2>;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-gpio";
gpio-controller;
interrupt-controller;
reg = <0x600 0x60>;
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
interrupts = <GIC_SHARED 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
mediatek,gpio-bank-widths = <32 32 32>;
}
Changing definition for "reg" and adding a new one for
"mediatek,gpio-bank-widths" as follows:
reg:
Define the base and range of the address space containing
the mediatek GPIO controller registers
mediatek,gpio-bank-widths:
Number of GPIO lines for each bank. Number of elements must
correspond to number of banks suggested by the 'reg' property.
Thanks in advance.
>
> Rob
Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-02 7:30 [PATCH 0/2] gpio: mediatek: driver for gpio chip in MT7621 SoC Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-02 7:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mediatek: add driver for MT7621 Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-08 11:59 ` Linus Walleij
2018-06-08 12:17 ` Linus Walleij
2018-06-09 6:17 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-09 5:54 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-11 3:29 ` Sean Wang
2018-06-02 7:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: document gpio-mt7621 bindings Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-12 20:56 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-13 9:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-06-13 16:23 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-13 19:28 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-14 4:45 ` Sergio Paracuellos [this message]
2018-06-14 14:17 ` Linus Walleij
2018-06-14 16:20 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2018-06-14 14:14 ` Linus Walleij
2018-06-14 14:33 ` Rob Herring
2018-06-14 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614044539.GA8681@foobar \
--to=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).