[PATCH][next] pinctrl: actions: fix unsigned less than zero comparison

[PATCH][next] pinctrl: actions: fix unsigned less than zero comparison

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The check to see if platform_get_irq failed is performed on the
unsigned value of pctrl->irq[i] and the check is never true because
an unsigned cannot be less than zero.  Fix this by assinging the
signed int ret to the return of platform_get_irq and checking ret
instead.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1470247 ("Unsigned comparison against 0")

Fixes: 6c5d0736e9c0 ("pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
index 4fa9cc377b3b..133ce9e0000a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
@@ -1026,11 +1026,10 @@ int owl_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->num_irq ; i++) {
-		pctrl->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
-		if (pctrl->irq[i] < 0) {
-			ret = pctrl->irq[i];
+		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+		pctrl->irq[i] = ret;
+		if (ret < 0)
 			goto err_exit;
-		}
 	}
 
 	ret = owl_gpio_init(pctrl);
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH][next] pinctrl: actions: fix unsigned less than zero comparison

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Hi Colin,

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:15:04PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The check to see if platform_get_irq failed is performed on the
> unsigned value of pctrl->irq[i] and the check is never true because
> an unsigned cannot be less than zero.  Fix this by assinging the
> signed int ret to the return of platform_get_irq and checking ret
> instead.
> 

Thanks for spotting!

> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1470247 ("Unsigned comparison against 0")
> 
> Fixes: 6c5d0736e9c0 ("pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> index 4fa9cc377b3b..133ce9e0000a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> @@ -1026,11 +1026,10 @@ int owl_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->num_irq ; i++) {
> -		pctrl->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> -		if (pctrl->irq[i] < 0) {
> -			ret = pctrl->irq[i];
> +		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> +		pctrl->irq[i] = ret;

Can we move this statement below if condition:

ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
if (ret < 0)
	goto err_exit;
pctrl->irq[i] = ret;

This looks slightly better.

Thanks,
Mani

> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			goto err_exit;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = owl_gpio_init(pctrl);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>