From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: fix deferred probing support
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:22:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180712192222.32481-1-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
AT91 pinctrl deferred probing support is broken if the GPIO devices
haven't probed first and set gpio_banks to non-zero. The later condition
that only some GPIO devices haven't probed can't actually happen as
either all the GPIO devices have probed first or none of them have. Plus
the pinctrl driver has already returned -EINVAL, so it's not on the
deferred list to retry probing.
Fix this by consolidating the checking that all GPIO devices are probed.
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
This is a result of trying to remove of_platform_default_populate from
at91 code and relying on the DT core handling populating devices. That
changed the probe order and broke booting.
Compile tested only.
Rob
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 36 ++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
index 50f0ec42c637..167838901b75 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct at91_pinctrl *info)
{
int ret = 0;
- int i, j;
+ int i, j, ngpio_chips_enabled = 0;
uint32_t *tmp;
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
struct device_node *child;
@@ -1175,10 +1175,17 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
at91_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
- if (gpio_banks < 1) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "you need to specify at least one gpio-controller\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ /*
+ * We need all the GPIO drivers to probe FIRST, or we will not be able
+ * to obtain references to the struct gpio_chip * for them, and we
+ * need this to proceed.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_GPIO_BANKS; i++)
+ if (gpio_chips[i])
+ ngpio_chips_enabled++;
+
+ if (ngpio_chips_enabled < info->nactive_banks)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
ret = at91_pinctrl_mux_mask(info, np);
if (ret)
@@ -1234,7 +1241,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct at91_pinctrl *info;
struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pdesc;
- int ret, i, j, k, ngpio_chips_enabled = 0;
+ int ret, i, j, k;
info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info)
@@ -1244,23 +1251,6 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- /*
- * We need all the GPIO drivers to probe FIRST, or we will not be able
- * to obtain references to the struct gpio_chip * for them, and we
- * need this to proceed.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < gpio_banks; i++)
- if (gpio_chips[i])
- ngpio_chips_enabled++;
-
- if (ngpio_chips_enabled < info->nactive_banks) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
- "All GPIO chips are not registered yet (%d/%d)\n",
- ngpio_chips_enabled, info->nactive_banks);
- devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, info);
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- }
-
at91_pinctrl_desc.name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
at91_pinctrl_desc.npins = gpio_banks * MAX_NB_GPIO_PER_BANK;
at91_pinctrl_desc.pins = pdesc =
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 19:22 Rob Herring [this message]
2018-07-13 9:24 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: fix deferred probing support Ludovic Desroches
2018-07-13 9:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2018-07-13 15:27 ` Rob Herring
2018-07-16 13:58 ` Linus Walleij
2018-07-16 14:31 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180712192222.32481-1-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).