From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Add level wakeup handling for omap4 based SoCs Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:41:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20180911184150.GD5662@atomide.com> References: <20180910200624.4494-1-tony@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180910200624.4494-1-tony@atomide.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot Cc: Grygorii Strashko , Keerthy , Tero Kristo , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org * Tony Lindgren [180910 20:10]: > I noticed that unlike omap2 and 3 based SoCs, omap4 based SoCs keep > the GPIO clocks enabled for GPIO level interrupts with wakeup enabled. > This blocks deeper idle states as the whole domain will stay busy. Linus, assuming people are OK with this one, I'd appreciate an immutable branch against v4.19-rc1 for this and a follow-up patch "[PATCH] gpio: omap: Remove custom PM calls and use cpu_pm instead". That's because of the arch/arm/mach-omap2 dependency that might conflict for v4.20 (although unlikely). Regards, Tony