From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gpio: gpio-tegra: simplify getting .driver_data
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:01:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022080150.GA3620@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181021200002.1472-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:00:00PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-21 19:59 [PATCH 0/6] gpio: simplify getting .driver_data Wolfram Sang
2018-10-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] gpio: gpio-dwapb: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-30 13:12 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] gpio: gpio-lynxpoint: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-30 13:14 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] gpio: gpio-mxc: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-30 13:15 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] gpio: gpio-omap: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-22 18:30 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-10-30 13:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] gpio: gpio-tegra: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-22 8:01 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2018-10-30 13:20 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-21 20:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] gpio: gpio-zynq: " Wolfram Sang
2018-10-30 13:19 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022080150.GA3620@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).