From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Charles Keepax Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] pinctrl: lochnagar: Add support for the Cirrus Logic Lochnagar Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:53:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20181115115335.GA16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20181108101405.14062-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> <20181108101405.14062-7-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Lee Jones , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Liam Girdwood , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , patches@opensource.cirrus.com, linux-clk , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:54:48AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:14 AM Charles Keepax > wrote: > > > Lochnagar is an evaluation and development board for Cirrus > > Logic Smart CODEC and Amp devices. It allows the connection of > > most Cirrus Logic devices on mini-cards, as well as allowing > > connection of various application processor systems to provide a > > full evaluation platform. This driver supports the board > > controller chip on the Lochnagar board. > > > > Lochnagar provides many pins which can generally be used for an > > audio function such as an AIF or a PDM interface, but also as > > GPIOs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax > > This v4 version looks very good to me! > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > Nitpicks (fix or not, my review tag stands): > > > drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-lochnagar.c | 1145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/pinctrl/cirrus/pinctrl-lochnagar.h | 112 +++ > > Why don't you just include that header file in the C file. > 112 lines +/- on a 1145 line file doesn't matter. > > > + priv->gpio_chip = template_chip; > > I would just skip the template and just assign struct members > directly. > > Bonus if you set ->label to something instance-unique as well. > No objection to any of those need to respin for Mark's comments on the regulators anyway, so will wrap these in and add your reviewed by. Thanks, Charles