linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	andy.gross@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	dianders@chromium.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org, niklas.cassel@linaro.org,
	david.brown@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] spmi: pmic-arb: disassociate old virq if hwirq mapping already exists
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:42:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190115004203.GK9278@minitux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190113154716.5145-7-masneyb@onstation.org>

On Sun 13 Jan 07:47 PST 2019, Brian Masney wrote:

> Check to see if the hwirq is already associated with another virq on
> this IRQ domain. If so, then disassociate it before associating the
> hwirq with the new virq.
> 
> This is a temporary hack that is needed in order to not break git
> bisect for existing boards. The next patch in this series converts
> spmi-gpio to be a hierarchical IRQ chip, then there are several patches
> to update all of the device tree files, and finally this patch will be
> reverted within the same patch series.
> 

You must maintain compatibility with existing DTB files (at least for
some time), so I don't think we can revert this patch at the end of the
series. 

But the patch itself looks reasonable,

Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> IRQs for spmi-gpio are all initially setup without an IRQ hierarchy
> on pmic-arb when mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c is probed (via the
> devm_of_platform_populate call) due to the interrupts property in
> device tree. Once spmi-gpio is converted to be a hierarchical IRQ chip
> in the next patch, existing users of gpio[d]_to_irq() will call
> pmic_gpio_to_irq(), and that will use the new IRQ chip code in
> spmi-gpio that sets up the IRQ in an IRQ hierarchy. The hwirq is now
> associated with two Linux virqs and interrupts will not work as
> expected. This patch corrects that issue.
> 
> Driver was tested using gpio-keys and iadc/vadc on the LG Nexus 5
> (hammerhead) phone.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
> ---
> This is a new patch introduced in V4, but this logic was present in V1.
> 
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> index 356bc3f66e22..b7cfee831417 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> @@ -744,8 +744,14 @@ static void qpnpint_irq_domain_map(struct spmi_pmic_arb *pmic_arb,
>  				   struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
>  				   irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
>  {
> +	unsigned int old_virq;
> +
>  	dev_dbg(&pmic_arb->spmic->dev, "virq = %u, hwirq = %lu\n", virq, hwirq);
>  
> +	old_virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq);
> +	if (old_virq)
> +		irq_domain_disassociate(domain, old_virq);
> +
>  	irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, hwirq, &pmic_arb_irqchip, pmic_arb,
>  			    handle_level_irq, NULL, NULL);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-15  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-13 15:47 [PATCH v4 00/14] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip Brian Masney
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: add qcom,pmi8998-gpio binding Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:42   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:28   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-15 20:07   ` Rob Herring
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: add support for three new variants Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:28   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: hardcode IRQ counts Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:34   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-15  1:14     ` Brian Masney
2019-01-15  1:24       ` Brian Masney
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] spmi: pmic-arb: convert to v2 irq interfaces to support hierarchical IRQ chips Brian Masney
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] gpio: add irq domain activate/deactivate functions Brian Masney
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] spmi: pmic-arb: disassociate old virq if hwirq mapping already exists Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:50   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:42   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] qcom: spmi-gpio: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip Brian Masney
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] ARM: dts: qcom: pm8941: add interrupt controller properties Brian Masney
2019-01-15  0:42   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] ARM: dts: qcom: pma8084: " Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:42   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8005: " Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8998: " Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:44   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8994: " Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8998: " Brian Masney
2019-01-14 23:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-15  0:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-01-13 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] spmi: pmic-arb: revert "disassociate old virq if hwirq mapping already exists" Brian Masney
2019-01-14  8:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] qcom: spmi: add support for hierarchical IRQ chip Linus Walleij
2019-01-14  8:45   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190115004203.GK9278@minitux \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).