[PATCH] pinctrl:intel: Retain HOSTSW_OWN for requested gpio pin

[PATCH] pinctrl:intel: Retain HOSTSW_OWN for requested gpio pin

[Chris Chiu]

The touchpad of the ASUS laptops E403NA, X540NA, X541NA are not
responsive after suspend/resume. The following error message
shows after resume.
 i2c_hid i2c-ELAN1200:00: failed to reset device.

On these laptops, the touchpad interrupt is connected via a GPIO
pin which is controlled by Intel pinctrl. After system resumes,
the GPIO is in ACPI mode and no longer works as an IRQ.

This commit saves the HOSTSW_OWN value during suspend, make sure
the HOSTSW_OWN mode remains the same after resume.

Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 8cda7b535b02..3930819049c4 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct intel_pad_context {
 
 struct intel_community_context {
 	u32 *intmask;
+	u32 *hostown;
 };
 
 struct intel_pinctrl_context {
@@ -1284,7 +1285,7 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_pm_init(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < pctrl->ncommunities; i++) {
 		struct intel_community *community = &pctrl->communities[i];
-		u32 *intmask;
+		u32 *intmask, *hostown;
 
 		intmask = devm_kcalloc(pctrl->dev, community->ngpps,
 				       sizeof(*intmask), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1292,6 +1293,13 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_pm_init(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		communities[i].intmask = intmask;
+
+		hostown = devm_kcalloc(pctrl->dev, community->ngpps,
+				       sizeof(*hostown), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!hostown)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		communities[i].hostown = hostown;
 	}
 
 	pctrl->context.pads = pads;
@@ -1503,6 +1511,10 @@ int intel_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
 		base = community->regs + community->ie_offset;
 		for (gpp = 0; gpp < community->ngpps; gpp++)
 			communities[i].intmask[gpp] = readl(base + gpp * 4);
+
+		base = community->regs + community->hostown_offset;
+		for (gpp = 0; gpp < community->ngpps; gpp++)
+			communities[i].hostown[gpp] = readl(base + gpp * 4);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1529,6 +1541,28 @@ static void intel_gpio_irq_init(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl)
 	}
 }
 
+static u32
+intel_gpio_is_requested(struct gpio_chip *chip, int base, unsigned int size)
+{
+	u32 requested = 0;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
+		if (gpiochip_is_requested(chip, base + i))
+			requested |= BIT(i);
+
+	return requested;
+}
+
+static void
+intel_gpio_update_pad_mode(void __iomem *hostown, u32 mask, u32 value)
+{
+	u32 curr = readl(hostown);
+	u32 updated = (curr & ~mask) | (value & mask);
+
+	return writel(updated, hostown);
+}
+
 int intel_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
@@ -1588,6 +1622,20 @@ int intel_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
 			dev_dbg(dev, "restored mask %d/%u %#08x\n", i, gpp,
 				readl(base + gpp * 4));
 		}
+
+		base = community->regs + community->hostown_offset;
+		for (gpp = 0; gpp < community->ngpps; gpp++) {
+			const struct intel_padgroup *padgrp = &community->gpps[gpp];
+			u32 requested = 0;
+
+			if (padgrp->gpio_base < 0)
+				continue;
+
+			requested = intel_gpio_is_requested(&pctrl->chip,
+					padgrp->gpio_base, padgrp->size);
+			intel_gpio_update_pad_mode(base + gpp * 4, requested,
+					communities[i].hostown[gpp]);
+		}
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.21.0

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl:intel: Retain HOSTSW_OWN for requested gpio pin

[Mika Westerberg]

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:21:03PM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> +static void
> +intel_gpio_update_pad_mode(void __iomem *hostown, u32 mask, u32 value)
> +{
> +	u32 curr = readl(hostown);
> +	u32 updated = (curr & ~mask) | (value & mask);

I think here we should first complain if the expected ownership is not
correct. Warning or info level probably enough.

> +
> +	return writel(updated, hostown);

Also if the pin is not requested and not changed we should not touch the
register.

Otherwise this looks good to me.

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl:intel: Retain HOSTSW_OWN for requested gpio pin

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:41:06AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:21:03PM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> > +static void

static u32

(see below why)

> > +intel_gpio_update_pad_mode(void __iomem *hostown, u32 mask, u32 value)
> > +{
> > +	u32 curr = readl(hostown);
> > +	u32 updated = (curr & ~mask) | (value & mask);
> 
> I think here we should first complain if the expected ownership is not
> correct. Warning or info level probably enough.

It is easy to achieve, something like

if ((value ^ saved) & requeted)
	dev_warn(...);

See also below.

(I had mentioned this earlier)

> > +	return writel(updated, hostown);

writel() is a void function, this is wrong. We need to return curr instead to
make above working to issue a warning message.

> Also if the pin is not requested and not changed we should not touch the
> register.

I don't think it brings any value here, if mask is 0 we will write back the
same value we read.

> Otherwise this looks good to me.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko