From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/63] Include linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs into Sphinx TOC tree Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:52:28 -0300 Message-ID: <20190424135228.58cdb9be@coco.lan> References: <20190423162932.21428-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20190424101846.7cc4bad7@lwn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190424101846.7cc4bad7@lwn.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Changbin Du , Bjorn Helgaas , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, fenghua.yu@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Em Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:18:46 -0600 Jonathan Corbet escreveu: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:28:29 +0800 > Changbin Du wrote: > > > The kernel now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation > > from reStructuredText files. I converted all of the Linux ACPI/PCI/X86 docs to > > reST format in this serias. > > > > In this version I combined ACPI and PCI docs, and added new x86 docs conversion. > > As mentioned by others, this is a lot of stuff; I would really rather see > each of those groups as separate patch sets. Yeah, makes sense to me, either to split into separate patchsets or to group the changes per sub-dir (or both). > If you can do a reasonably quick turnaround with Mauro's suggestions > addressed and tags applied, we should be able to get at least some of this > into 5.2. Thanks, Mauro, for looking at all of this stuff! Anytime! Just to make clear, I'm still reviewing it... I'm at patch 35/63 now. So, expect more comments from my side. Thanks, Mauro